On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 10:13:51AM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 10:05:30AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 10:01:25AM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > > > Again i rely on this. > > > > I'm not sure what your random quoting of low-quality comments in > > kernel code is trying to prove here. > > > > Any device that does not support the LBA/sector size correctly is > > not support by Linux. We could in theory quirk it in the driver, > > but for that we'd need to known the vendor/model and a good argument > > why we can't fix the device reporting, as this should just be firmware. > > > > Secrecy is not going to help with that. > > > I will not resist. > > I tried my best to explain the problem including description and steps > how to reproduce it in the commit message if someone wants to repeat it > in qemu with virtual nvme device.
Again, the problem is that your device reports an incorrect block size. And you're being a complete dick ignoring this and not even telling us anything about the device.
