Oh, sorry — I thought it was a typo and was wondering how come no one
caught it.
在 2025/11/19 01:11, Mikulas Patocka 写道:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2025, Aiden Ma wrote:
The name of workqueue verify_wq should be "kverifyd", not "kverityd".
Signed-off-by: Aiden Ma <[email protected]>
---
drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
index 66a00a8ccb39..e8f1300f5f25 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
@@ -1549,7 +1549,7 @@ static int verity_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int
argc, char **argv)
* will fall-back to using it for error handling (or if the bufio cache
* doesn't have required hashes).
*/
- v->verify_wq = alloc_workqueue("kverityd", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_HIGHPRI,
0);
+ v->verify_wq = alloc_workqueue("kverifyd", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_HIGHPRI,
0);
if (!v->verify_wq) {
ti->error = "Cannot allocate workqueue";
r = -ENOMEM;
--
2.43.0
Hi
The target is called "verity", not "verify", so I think that "kverityd" -
as "kernel-verity-daemon" is OK.
Mikulas
