On 4/13/18 12:52 AM, Martin Wilck wrote:
On Thu, 2018-04-12 at 16:57 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
To indicate that the default licence is LGPL-2.0,
since there are still a lot of files without a licence header.
Result:
multipath-tools/
└── LICENSE.default -> LICENSES/LGPL-2.0
License.default is better than COPYING, which, as you said yourself,
normally refers to a GPL-type license.
But I'm unsure if this really clarifies matters. If adding my lenghty
review document to the tree is out of the question, a note in the
README might be more helpful than this link:
License
=======
The multipath-tools source code is covered by several different
licenses. Refer to the individual source files for details.
Source files which do not have a license header are shipped under <-------
LGPL-2.0 (see LICENSES/LGPL-2.0). <-------
This was added to README:
https://github.com/opensvc/multipath-tools/commit/a4c4b80a32e43598aac40a6b25c871b20a7ca1f8
However, there are file where this is not true, e.g.: some of them under
libmultipath/nvme/
