Hi Dave, all,

I'm one of the original reporters and very much a user, not a block/dm
developer, so please sanity-check all of this.

Your trace looks like what the two earlier reports hit: a read reaching
a leaf device with sectors > 0 but phys_seg 0 (an empty bio). One aside
that may help read the trace: blk_io_trace.error is a __u16, so the
bracketed values on your C lines are errnos as u16 (65514 = -EINVAL,
65531 = -EIO).

The WARN itself is new, the bad bio isn't. bio_add_page() only started
rejecting len == 0 in 643893647cac ("block: reject zero length in
bio_add_page()", v7.1-rc1); on 7.0.8 the same empty bio tripped
scsi_alloc_sgtables()'s !nr_segs instead, which matches what you saw.
That fits your "not a recent regression": the condition is older, v7.1
just made it loud.

For Tomas's and my reports (QEMU O_DIRECT to the LV block device) the
origin looks like 5ff3f74e145a ("block: simplify direct io validity
check", v6.18): blkdev_dio_invalid() now checks only aggregate
ki_pos | count alignment and dropped the per-segment
bdev_iter_is_aligned() walk, so a degenerate or misaligned O_DIRECT no
longer gets -EINVAL at the fops boundary. But your reproducer reads a
file, which goes through the filesystem O_DIRECT path and never calls
blkdev_dio_invalid(), and still makes the empty bio. So it isn't only
that one entry point.

dm-mirror then hangs because Keith's f7b24c7b41f2 only covers md
raid1/raid10; legacy dm-mirror (dm-raid1.c) has no equivalent and
rebuilds the empty read onto the other leg. Note the leg's status isn't
even consistent (your SATA path returns BLK_STS_IOERR, not
BLK_STS_INVAL), so copying that status check into dm-mirror probably
wouldn't catch every case.

For what it's worth, that points me toward rejecting the empty or
misaligned bio once, at submission, with -EINVAL, rather than teaching
each consumer to tolerate it. But you'll know the tradeoffs far better
than I do.

I have a small QEMU + LVM raid1/mirror setup that reproduces the
block-device variant and bisects to 5ff3f74e. Happy to run your file
reproducer with some instrumentation at the dm-mirror read entry
(bi_size vs bio_sectors vs bvec lengths) to see whether the bio is
already empty on arrival or built that way on the retry, and to test
any patch.

Thanks,
Vjaceslavs


On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 5:50 AM Dr. David Alan Gilbert
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> * Thorsten Leemhuis ([email protected]) wrote:
> > On 6/14/26 19:57, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > >
> > >   I've got a repeatable raid hang/warn and would appreciate some pointers
> > > as where to debug.
> > >   (I've been logging stuff on  
> > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221535 )
> >
> > Note: not my area of expertise, so I might be sending you totally
> > off-track with this comment. Feel free to ignore it. But FWIW:
>
> Hi Thorsten,
>   Thanks for the reply - these do seem to be related!
> (So copying in Keith, Vjaceslavs, and Tomáš )
> (Not my area either).
>
> > Have you seen these reports?
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/2982107.4sosBPzcNG@electra/
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAC_j7i1R7oy+nRhxEjCTba=dugn02w9x+p94dcu0ahv5+5t...@mail.gmail.com/
>
> I hadn't!  Those are both the problem I originally was trying to debug
> and stumbled into the WARN/BUG/hang with my test program.
>
> > The former lead to a fix in the mdraid code that should be in the kernel
> > version you are using. But in a reply to the latter report the repoter
> > claimed that that fix is not enough (claiming "this was obvious" and
> > also using dm), but things then stalled there.
>
> Yeh I see my world has Keith's f7b24c7b41f23
>
> I think the problem I'm seeing is zero length requests coming from somewhere.
>
> The WARN I'm seeing in 7.1.0-rc7+ is:
>
> [ 2681.597042] device-mapper: raid1: Mirror read failed from 252:25. Trying 
> alternative device.
> [ 2681.631933] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 2681.631939] WARNING: block/bio.c:1044 at bio_add_page+0x18b/0x250, CPU#22: 
> kworker/22:0/18929
>
> 1039 int bio_add_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page,
> 1040                  unsigned int len, unsigned int offset)
> 1041 {
> 1042         if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CLONED)))
> 1043                 return 0;
> 1044         if (WARN_ON_ONCE(len == 0))
> 1045                 return 0;
>
> So it's the ' if (WARN_ON_ONCE(len == 0))'
>
> and the warn I got on the older 7.0.8 was:
> [Sun May 17 17:22:52 2026] WARNING: drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:1140 at 
> scsi_alloc_sgtables+0x38a/0x400, CPU#28: kworker/28:1H/3943
>
> which I *think* corresponds to:
> 1164         if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!nr_segs))
> 1165                 return BLK_STS_IOERR;
>
> so it sounds like we need to find where zero length requests are coming from??
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Dave
>
> > Ciao, Thorsten
> >
> > >   This started off as debugging a case where I'd get my RAID1 (on the 
> > > host)
> > > getting a reliable 'rescheduling sector'/disk failure while running the 
> > > qemu block test suite
> > > during a qemu build, but then I tried to build a smaller discrete
> > > test, and now I've got a simply triggerable warn and test hang.
> > > There's no errors from the underlying SATA layer on the storage,
> > > everything resyncs just fine.
> > >
> > > I've got an existing LVM vg ('main') with two mirrors on sda2, and sdb2
> > > which are SATA disks.
> > >
> > > # lvcreate --type mirror --mirrors 1 -L 1G main /dev/sda2 /dev/sdb2
> > > # mkfs.ext4 /dev/mapper/main-lvol0
> > > # mount /dev/mapper/main-lvol0 /mnt/tmp/
> > > # chmod a+rwx /mnt/tmp
> > >
> > > $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/tmp/testfile bs=1024k count=1
> > >
> > > (I then wait for the IO to stop)
> > >
> > > then we've got this little test program:
> > >
> > > <--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><-->
> > > #include <errno.h>
> > > #include <fcntl.h>
> > > #include <asm-generic/fcntl.h>
> > > #include <stdio.h>
> > > #include <unistd.h>
> > >
> > >
> > > const char* path="/mnt/tmp/testfile";
> > > static char buf[8192];
> > >
> > > int main()
> > > {
> > >   int fd=open(path, O_RDWR|O_DIRECT|O_CLOEXEC);
> > >
> > >   errno=0;
> > >   int res3=pread(fd, buf, 4096, 0);
> > >   printf("pread of 4096 said: %d (%m)\n", res3);
> > >
> > > }
> > > <--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><-->
> > >
> > > running that, either hangs or gets a 'pread of 4096 said: -1 
> > > (Input/output error)'
> > > when it hangs it's unkillable.
> > >
> > > at the moment (on 7.1.0-rc7) this is giving:
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: device-mapper: raid1: Mirror read failed 
> > > from 252:24. Trying alternative device.
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek dmeventd[1010]: Primary mirror device 252:24 read 
> > > failed.
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: WARNING: block/bio.c:1044 at 
> > > bio_add_page+0x18b/0x250, CPU#15: kworker/15:1/369
> > >
> > > (full backtrace below)
> > > (Note there is a moan in there about sdb IO error - repeated a lot - but
> > > again, there's no SATA level errors, and the drive is fine on smart, and
> > > I can read the whole of the underlying lvm mirrors, so I don't think it's
> > > physically there).
> > >
> > > I did a blktrace, although that gives me a 23G blkparse output, hmm
> > > (I see each event repeated a lot - maybe per thread?)
> > >
> > > 252,26  15        1     0.000000000  3435  Q  RS 264192 + 8 [dbf]
> > >   252,26 is /dev/mapper/main-lvol0
> > > 252,24  15        1     0.000005501  3435  A  RS 264192 + 8 <- (252,26) 
> > > 264192
> > >   252,24 is main-lvol0_mimage_0
> > > 252,24  15        2     0.000005761  3435  Q  RS 264192 + 8 [dbf]
> > >   8,0   15        1     0.000008646  3435  A  RS 71634944 + 8 <- (252,24) 
> > > 264192
> > >     so that's sda
> > >   8,0   15        2     0.000008787  3435  A  RS 73734144 + 8 <- (8,2) 
> > > 71634944
> > >     I guess mapping down from sda2 to sda
> > >   8,0   15        3     0.000009037  3435  Q  RS 73734144 + 8 [dbf]
> > >   8,0   15        4     0.000009809  3435  C  RS 73734144 + 8 [65514]
> > >       ??? Hmm what's the 65514 there?
> > > 252,24  15        3     0.000010320  3435  C  RS 264192 + 8 [65514]
> > > 252,25  15        1     0.000290384   369  Q   R 264192 + 8 [kworker/15:1]
> > >    252,25 is main-lvol0_mimage_1
> > >
> > > and at this point I'm a bit lost as to what I'm looking for.
> > >
> > > Hints appreciated!
> > >
> > > (I don't believe this is a regression - or at least not recent)
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: device-mapper: raid1: Mirror read failed 
> > > from 252:24. Trying alternative device.
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek dmeventd[1010]: Primary mirror device 252:24 read 
> > > failed.
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: WARNING: block/bio.c:1044 at 
> > > bio_add_page+0x18b/0x250, CPU#15: kworker/15:1/369
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek dmeventd[1010]: main-lvol0 is now in-sync.
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: Modules linked in: nft_masq nft_reject_ipv4 
> > > act_csum cls_u32 sch_htb nf_nat_tftp nf_conntrack_tftp bridge stp llc 
> > > rfkill nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet 
> > > nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reje>
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  drm_panel_backlight_quirks gpu_sched 
> > > drm_suballoc_helper video nvme drm_display_helper nvme_core cec 
> > > nvme_keyring sp5100_tco nvme_auth wmi serio_raw fuse scsi_dh_alua i2c_dev 
> > > scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh_emc
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: CPU: 15 UID: 0 PID: 369 Comm: kworker/15:1 
> > > Not tainted 7.1.0-rc7+ #786 PREEMPT(lazy)
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be 
> > > Filled By O.E.M./X570 Pro4, BIOS P3.10 07/13/2020
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: Workqueue: kmirrord do_mirror
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: RIP: 0010:bio_add_page+0x18b/0x250
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: Code: 24 10 4c 8b 04 24 84 c0 0f 85 c9 00 
> > > 00 00 41 0f b7 40 78 48 8b 74 24 08 8b 4c 24 14 e9 b4 fe ff ff 0f 0b 31 
> > > c0 e9 55 d1 af 00 <0f> 0b eb f5 48 8b 7f 08 83 7f 60 05 0f 85 00 ff ff ff 
> > > 49 8b 3b 4c
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffd1fb8176fc10 EFLAGS: 00010246
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffd1fb8176fd18 
> > > RCX: 0000000000000000
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 
> > > RDI: ffff8d1a8eb28b00
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffd1fb8176fc38 
> > > R09: ffffd1fb8176fc40
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: R10: ffffd1fb8176fc34 R11: 0000000000000000 
> > > R12: 0000000000000000
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: R13: ffffd1fb8176fd90 R14: 0000000000000001 
> > > R15: ffff8d1a8eb28b00
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: FS:  0000000000000000(0000) 
> > > GS:ffff8d29d161f000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 
> > > 0000000080050033
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: CR2: 00007f0ddcd7b9d0 CR3: 000000023dcbf000 
> > > CR4: 0000000000350ef0
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: Call Trace:
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  <TASK>
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  do_region+0x227/0x2a0
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  dispatch_io+0xf1/0x150
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? __pfx_bio_get_page+0x10/0x10
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? __pfx_bio_next_page+0x10/0x10
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? __pfx_read_callback+0x10/0x10
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  dm_io+0x169/0x2d0
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? __pfx_bio_get_page+0x10/0x10
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? __pfx_bio_next_page+0x10/0x10
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  do_reads+0x149/0x230
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? __pfx_read_callback+0x10/0x10
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  do_mirror+0x11a/0x2b0
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  process_one_work+0x19e/0x390
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  worker_thread+0x1a6/0x310
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  kthread+0xe4/0x120
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ret_from_fork+0x1a1/0x270
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  </TASK>
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: WARNING: drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:1164 at 
> > > scsi_alloc_sgtables+0x38a/0x400, CPU#15: kworker/15:1/369
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: Modules linked in: nft_masq nft_reject_ipv4 
> > > act_csum cls_u32 sch_htb nf_nat_tftp nf_conntrack_tftp bridge stp llc 
> > > rfkill nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib nft_reject_inet 
> > > nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reje>
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  drm_panel_backlight_quirks gpu_sched 
> > > drm_suballoc_helper video nvme drm_display_helper nvme_core cec 
> > > nvme_keyring sp5100_tco nvme_auth wmi serio_raw fuse scsi_dh_alua i2c_dev 
> > > scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh_emc
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: CPU: 15 UID: 0 PID: 369 Comm: kworker/15:1 
> > > Tainted: G        W           7.1.0-rc7+ #786 PREEMPT(lazy)
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: Tainted: [W]=WARN
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be 
> > > Filled By O.E.M./X570 Pro4, BIOS P3.10 07/13/2020
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: Workqueue: kmirrord do_mirror
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: RIP: 0010:scsi_alloc_sgtables+0x38a/0x400
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: Code: 8b 3d ba 2d a9 01 e9 d1 fd ff ff 48 
> > > 8b 75 00 48 8d bb f0 fe ff ff e8 15 b7 b0 ff 48 89 ab e0 00 00 00 89 45 
> > > 08 e9 30 ff ff ff <0f> 0b 4c 8b 6c 24 30 b8 0a 00 00 00 e9 21 ff ff ff b8 
> > > 09 00 00 00
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffd1fb8176f7f0 EFLAGS: 00010246
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8d1aedad0110 
> > > RCX: 0000000000000009
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff99c15960 
> > > RDI: ffff8d1aedad0110
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: RBP: ffff8d1a93d17000 R08: ffff8d1aedad0110 
> > > R09: ffff8d1a818fa800
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: R10: 7020676e69736961 R11: 0000000000000000 
> > > R12: 0000000000000000
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8d1a93394000 
> > > R15: ffff8d1a93d17000
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: FS:  0000000000000000(0000) 
> > > GS:ffff8d29d161f000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 
> > > 0000000080050033
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: CR2: 00007f0ddcd7b9d0 CR3: 000000023dcbf000 
> > > CR4: 0000000000350ef0
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: Call Trace:
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  <TASK>
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  sd_setup_read_write_cmnd+0x9d/0x740
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  scsi_queue_rq+0x4d2/0x890
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x241/0x530
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? sbitmap_get+0x61/0x100
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  __blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0x330/0x340
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  
> > > __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x143/0x180
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x2d/0x70
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x2bf/0x350
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  blk_mq_dispatch_list+0x172/0x350
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x51/0x1a0
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? blk_mq_submit_bio+0x71c/0x9f0
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  __blk_flush_plug+0x112/0x180
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  __submit_bio+0x19c/0x260
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  __submit_bio_noacct+0x8e/0x210
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  do_region+0x14c/0x2a0
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  dispatch_io+0xf1/0x150
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? __pfx_bio_get_page+0x10/0x10
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? __pfx_bio_next_page+0x10/0x10
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? __pfx_read_callback+0x10/0x10
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  dm_io+0x169/0x2d0
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? __pfx_bio_get_page+0x10/0x10
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? __pfx_bio_next_page+0x10/0x10
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  do_reads+0x149/0x230
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? __pfx_read_callback+0x10/0x10
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  do_mirror+0x11a/0x2b0
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  process_one_work+0x19e/0x390
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  worker_thread+0x1a6/0x310
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  kthread+0xe4/0x120
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ret_from_fork+0x1a1/0x270
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel:  </TASK>
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 50606087 op 
> > > 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 0 prio class 2
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 50606087 op 
> > > 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 0 prio class 2
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 50606087 op 
> > > 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 0 prio class 2
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 50606087 op 
> > > 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 0 prio class 2
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 50606087 op 
> > > 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 0 prio class 2
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 50606087 op 
> > > 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 0 prio class 2
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 50606087 op 
> > > 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 0 prio class 2
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 50606087 op 
> > > 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 0 prio class 2
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 50606087 op 
> > > 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 0 prio class 2
> > > Jun 14 18:08:32 dalek kernel: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 50606087 op 
> > > 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 0 prio class 2
> > > Jun 14 18:08:37 dalek kernel: blk_print_req_error: 241000 callbacks 
> > > suppressed
> > > Jun 14 18:08:37 dalek kernel: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 50606087 op 
> > > 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 0 prio class 2
> > >
> > >
> >
> --
>  -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------
> / Dr. David Alan Gilbert    |       Running GNU/Linux       | Happy  \
> \        dave @ treblig.org |                               | In Hex /
>  \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org   |_______/

Reply via email to