On 3/7/25 1:10 AM, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
The preferred term is "on" instead of "yes".
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <[email protected]>
---
multipath/multipath.conf.5.in | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/multipath/multipath.conf.5.in b/multipath/multipath.conf.5.in
index 0c1eff40..bdb6b605 100644
--- a/multipath/multipath.conf.5.in
+++ b/multipath/multipath.conf.5.in
@@ -1214,7 +1214,7 @@ Both multipathd and multipath treat every non-blacklisted
device as multipath
device path.
.TP
.I smart
-This differs from \fIfind_multipaths yes\fR only in
+This differs from \fIfind_multipaths on\fR only in
the way it treats new devices for which only one path has been
detected yet. When such a device is first encountered in udev rules, it is
treated as a multipath device. multipathd waits whether additional paths with
Could we please backport this patch to the stable-0.10.y and stable-0.11.y
branches?
Thanks.
