On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 01:48:14PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2026, at 12:36 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > Apologies for the git-send-email misfire.. still not sure what > > happened, but will sort it out for future. > > 3/4 looks sensible, and can go in now. 4/4 might need some > adjustment. Assuming, of course, there is no functional or > mechanical dependency on having 1/2 and 2/2 in the tree > first.
Right, 3/4 and 4/4 don't have dependency on 1/2 or 2/2. Thanks, Mike
