I tend to agree with Xose this is unfair to set user_friendly_name in the hwtable entries. Does anybody have a vote against my merging this patch ?
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez <[email protected]> wrote: > This is up to sysadmins, and it is already off by default. > > Cc: Christophe Varoqui <[email protected]> > Cc: device-mapper development <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <[email protected]> > --- > libmultipath/hwtable.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libmultipath/hwtable.c b/libmultipath/hwtable.c > index 598b9b8..bef8d31 100644 > --- a/libmultipath/hwtable.c > +++ b/libmultipath/hwtable.c > @@ -794,7 +794,6 @@ static struct hwentry default_hw[] = { > .prio_name = PRIO_ONTAP, > .prio_args = NULL, > .retain_hwhandler = RETAIN_HWHANDLER_ON, > - .user_friendly_names = USER_FRIENDLY_NAMES_OFF, > .detect_prio = DETECT_PRIO_ON, > }, > /* > @@ -1133,7 +1132,6 @@ static struct hwentry default_hw[] = { > .pgfailback = -FAILBACK_IMMEDIATE, > .checker_name = TUR, > .fast_io_fail = 10, > - .user_friendly_names = USER_FRIENDLY_NAMES_OFF, > .prio_name = DEFAULT_PRIO, > .no_path_retry = 0, > .dev_loss = 60, > -- > 2.5.5 > >
-- dm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
