From: Christian Kastner <[email protected]>

When invoking kpartx -d $FOO with $FOO being a regular file, the intention is
to also detach the loop device backing $FOO using del_loop(), but this
currently doesn't happen, as can be seen by calling losetup -a afterwards.

This is because the check for the type of $FOO, prior to the del_loop() call, is
broken. S_ISREG() is called on a buffer that initially did contain the status of
$FOO, but was later overwritten with the status of the backing loop device.

This replaces the S_ISREG() test with a check for whether the loop device path
is not NULL. If it isn't, then we know that it contains the correct path, and
del_loop() can be called safely on that.

Reported as Debian bug #829496; that bug also has more information.

Signed-off-by: Christian Kastner <[email protected]>
---
 kpartx/kpartx.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kpartx/kpartx.c b/kpartx/kpartx.c
index 4de13fa..b7b4047 100644
--- a/kpartx/kpartx.c
+++ b/kpartx/kpartx.c
@@ -482,14 +482,14 @@ main(int argc, char **argv){
                                        printf("del devmap : %s\n", partname);
                        }
 
-                       if (S_ISREG (buf.st_mode)) {
-                               if (del_loop(device)) {
+                       if (loopdev) {
+                               if (del_loop(loopdev)) {
                                        if (verbose)
                                                printf("can't del loop : %s\n",
-                                                       device);
+                                                       loopdev);
                                        exit(1);
                                }
-                               printf("loop deleted : %s\n", device);
+                               printf("loop deleted : %s\n", loopdev);
                        }
                        break;
 
-- 
2.8.1

--
dm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to