On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 16:57 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:05:36AM +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> > Some multipath commands are dangerous to run while multipathd is
> > running.
> > For example, "multipath -r" may apply a modified configuration to
> > the kernel,
> > while multipathd is still using the old configuration, leading to
> > inconsistent state between multipathd and the kernel.
> >
> > It is safer to use equivalent multipathd client commands instead.
> > For now, do this only for "multipath -r", but other invocations
> > may be added in the future. Perhaps some day, all "multipath"
> > commands will be mapped to multipathd actions.
>
> Thanks. I've been meaning to do something like this forever.
[...]
> + if (execv(mpd_path, argv) == -1) {
> > + condlog(0, "failed to execute multipathd: %s",
> > strerror(errno));
> > + exit(1);
> > + }
>
> Why exec multipathd, instead of using the libmpathcmd api, like
> mpathpersist, libdmmp, and the multipathd client do?
Thanks for the review. I'll look into that, and your other suggestions.
Martin
--
Dr. Martin Wilck <mwi...@suse.com>, Tel. +49 (0)911 74053 2107
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
