On Wed, Oct 18 2017 at 11:12pm -0400,
Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> > On Oct 18, 2017, at 9:06 PM, Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Michael Lyle <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> On 10/16/2017 05:01 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> >>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer 
> >>> to
> >>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and 
> >>> from_timer()
> >>> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
> >>> 
> >>> Cc: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]>
> >>> Cc: Shaohua Li <[email protected]>
> >>> Cc: Alasdair Kergon <[email protected]>
> >>> Cc: Mike Snitzer <[email protected]>
> >>> Cc: [email protected]
> >>> Cc: [email protected]
> >>> Cc: [email protected]
> >>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
> >> 
> >> This looks good to me-- I'm fine with Jens or someone else picking this
> >> up directly, or would take a bcache-specific one to apply to my tree.
> >> 
> >> Reviewed-by: Michael Lyle <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Jens, can you pick this up, or would you prefer I split it up?

Jens, would you be OK picking it up from patchwork?  If so, see:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10010303/

You can add mine too:
Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <[email protected]>

--
dm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to