Looks good. Thanks for reviewing. Reviewed-by: Guan Junxiong <[email protected]>
On 2017/11/18 8:11, Martin Wilck wrote: > This is not a critical error. It just means that the path in > question will have low priority (rightly so, if it has >100s latency). > > Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <[email protected]>> --- > libmultipath/prioritizers/path_latency.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/libmultipath/prioritizers/path_latency.c > b/libmultipath/prioritizers/path_latency.c > index b8c5bc7c50a4..ce5c95dd7075 100644 > --- a/libmultipath/prioritizers/path_latency.c > +++ b/libmultipath/prioritizers/path_latency.c > @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ int getprio(struct path *pp, char *args, unsigned int > timeout) > (long long)pow(base_num, lg_avglatency)); > > if (lg_avglatency > lg_maxavglatency) { > - pp_pl_log(0, > + pp_pl_log(2, > "%s: average latency (%lld us) is outside the > thresold (%lld us)", > pp->dev, (long long)pow(base_num, lg_avglatency), > (long long)MAX_AVG_LATENCY); > -- dm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
