On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 17:47 -0600, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > > I have one nit here. print.h now relies on dm-generic.h, since it > uses > dm_multipath_to_gen() in its defines. So shouldn't it simply include > dm-generic.h, which would allow configure.c, main.c, and > cli_handlers.c > to not include dm-generic.h, since they only need it because they > include print.h?
Sure, I can do that. This is a basic style question - should .h files (a) contain #includes for all other header files they depend on, or should (b) the .c code be required to #include everything in correct order? AFAICS we don't have a policy about that in multipath-tools, it's sometimes this way and sometimes the other way. Personally I'm slightly inclined towards (b) because it makes the dependencies of .c files more explicit, but I don't care much. (a) makes the life of the programmer a bit easier. Regards, Martin -- Dr. Martin Wilck <mwi...@suse.com>, Tel. +49 (0)911 74053 2107 SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- dm-devel mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel