This patch avoids that gcc reports the following:

main.c: In function 'uev_pathfail_check':
main.c:1022:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... 
[-Wmisleading-indentation]
     if (!pp)
     ^~
main.c:1024:2: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented 
as if it were guarded by the 'if'
  r = io_err_stat_handle_pathfail(pp);
  ^

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanass...@wdc.com>
---
 multipathd/main.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/multipathd/main.c b/multipathd/main.c
index 27cf234623d0..ccbb0ad13d32 100644
--- a/multipathd/main.c
+++ b/multipathd/main.c
@@ -1020,8 +1020,8 @@ uev_pathfail_check(struct uevent *uev, struct vectors 
*vecs)
        lock(&vecs->lock);
        pthread_testcancel();
        pp = find_path_by_devt(vecs->pathvec, devt);
-    if (!pp)
-        goto out_lock;
+       if (!pp)
+               goto out_lock;
        r = io_err_stat_handle_pathfail(pp);
        if (r)
                condlog(3, "io_err_stat: %s: cannot handle pathfail uevent",
-- 
2.16.2

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to