On Tue, 2018-03-13 at 13:07 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Just a thought: Maybe dm-4.16 (rc4 based) is missing a blk-mq fix?
> Might be worth cherry-picking the 2 topmost commits from dm-4.16 into
> the linus-based (rc5) tree you reported the original issue against?
> (looking at jens' rc5 block pull request, it seems unlikely but...)
Even if that would be the case, that can't have been the cause of what I
reported. Before I run any dm tests I merge the block layer, SCSI and RDMA
changes that are scheduled for the next kernel version into the dm tree.
dm-devel mailing list