On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 03:51:26PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I still don't understand why mp_bvec_last_segment isn't simply > called bvec_last_segment as there is no conflict. But I don't > want to hold this series up on that as there only are two users > left and we can always just fix it up later.
mp_bvec_last_segment() is one bvec helper, so better to keep its name consistent with other bvec helpers. Thanks, Ming -- dm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
