On 12/6/19 6:21 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05 2019 at 5:42P -0500,
Nikos Tsironis <[email protected]> wrote:
On 12/6/19 12:09 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05 2019 at 4:49pm -0500,
Nikos Tsironis <[email protected]> wrote:
For dm-thin, indeed, there is not much to gain by not using
blkdev_issue_flush(), since we still allocate a new bio, indirectly, in
the stack.
But thinp obviously could if there is actual benefit to avoiding this
flush bio allocation, via blkdev_issue_flush, every commit.
Yes, we could do the flush in thinp exactly the same way we do it in
dm-clone. Add a struct bio field in struct pool_c and use that in the
callback.
It would work since the callback is called holding a write lock on
pmd->root_lock, so it's executed only by a single thread at a time.
I didn't go for it in my implementation, because I didn't like having to
make that assumption in the callback, i.e., that it's executed under a
lock and so it's safe to have the bio in struct pool_c.
In hindsight, maybe this was a bad call, since it's technically feasible
to do it this way and we could just add a comment stating that the
callback is executed atomically.
If you want I can send a new follow-on patch tomorrow implementing the
flush in thinp the same way it's implemented in dm-clone.
I took care of it, here is the incremental:
Awesome, thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-thin.c b/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
index 73d191ddbb9f..57626c27a54b 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
@@ -328,6 +328,7 @@ struct pool_c {
dm_block_t low_water_blocks;
struct pool_features requested_pf; /* Features requested during table
load */
struct pool_features adjusted_pf; /* Features used after adjusting for
constituent devices */
+ struct bio flush_bio;
};
/*
@@ -3123,6 +3124,7 @@ static void pool_dtr(struct dm_target *ti)
__pool_dec(pt->pool);
dm_put_device(ti, pt->metadata_dev);
dm_put_device(ti, pt->data_dev);
+ bio_uninit(&pt->flush_bio);
kfree(pt);
mutex_unlock(&dm_thin_pool_table.mutex);
@@ -3202,8 +3204,13 @@ static void metadata_low_callback(void *context)
static int metadata_pre_commit_callback(void *context)
{
struct pool_c *pt = context;
+ struct bio *flush_bio = &pt->flush_bio;
- return blkdev_issue_flush(pt->data_dev->bdev, GFP_NOIO, NULL);
+ bio_reset(flush_bio);
+ bio_set_dev(flush_bio, pt->data_dev->bdev);
+ flush_bio->bi_opf = REQ_OP_WRITE | REQ_PREFLUSH;
+
+ return submit_bio_wait(flush_bio);
}
static sector_t get_dev_size(struct block_device *bdev)
@@ -3374,6 +3381,7 @@ static int pool_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc,
char **argv)
pt->data_dev = data_dev;
pt->low_water_blocks = low_water_blocks;
pt->adjusted_pf = pt->requested_pf = pf;
+ bio_init(&pt->flush_bio, NULL, 0);
ti->num_flush_bios = 1;
/*
Looks good,
Thanks Nikos
--
dm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
