Support for new modifier of REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES command.
This results in allocation extents in backing file instead
of actual blocks zeroing.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Bob Liu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/block/loop.c |   20 +++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index 739b372a5112..0704167a5aaa 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -581,6 +581,16 @@ static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct 
loop_cmd *cmd,
        return 0;
 }
 
+/* Convert REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES modifiers into fallocate mode */
+static unsigned int write_zeroes_to_fallocate_mode(unsigned int flags)
+{
+       if (flags & REQ_ALLOCATE)
+               return 0;
+       if (flags & REQ_NOUNMAP)
+               return FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE;
+       return FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE;
+}
+
 static int do_req_filebacked(struct loop_device *lo, struct request *rq)
 {
        struct loop_cmd *cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
@@ -599,14 +609,8 @@ static int do_req_filebacked(struct loop_device *lo, 
struct request *rq)
        case REQ_OP_FLUSH:
                return lo_req_flush(lo, rq);
        case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
-               /*
-                * If the caller doesn't want deallocation, call zeroout to
-                * write zeroes the range.  Otherwise, punch them out.
-                */
                return lo_fallocate(lo, rq, pos,
-                       (rq->cmd_flags & REQ_NOUNMAP) ?
-                               FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE :
-                               FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE);
+                       write_zeroes_to_fallocate_mode(rq->cmd_flags));
        case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
                return lo_fallocate(lo, rq, pos, FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE);
        case REQ_OP_WRITE:
@@ -877,6 +881,7 @@ static void loop_config_discard(struct loop_device *lo)
                q->limits.discard_alignment = 0;
                blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, 0);
                blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, 0);
+               blk_queue_max_allocate_sectors(q, 0);
                blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
                return;
        }
@@ -886,6 +891,7 @@ static void loop_config_discard(struct loop_device *lo)
 
        blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, UINT_MAX >> 9);
        blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, UINT_MAX >> 9);
+       blk_queue_max_allocate_sectors(q, UINT_MAX >> 9);
        blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
 }
 



--
dm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to