On 2020/05/13 16:07, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Instead of excluding invalid zones we should check if the zone
> is sequential and exclude invalid states. That way we don't need
> to touch the selection when new zone states or flags are added.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-zoned-metadata.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-zoned-metadata.c b/drivers/md/dm-zoned-metadata.c
> index d9e256762eff..9b93d7ff1dfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-zoned-metadata.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-zoned-metadata.c
> @@ -1570,12 +1570,16 @@ static int dmz_reset_zone(struct dmz_metadata *zmd,
> struct dm_zone *zone)
> int ret;
>
> /*
> - * Ignore offline zones, read only zones,
> - * and conventional zones.
> + * Only check sequential zones.
Nit: the comment would be better as:
/* Only sequential zones need reset */
> + */
> + if (!dmz_is_seq(zone))
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * But ignore offline and read only zones.
> */
> if (dmz_is_offline(zone) ||
> - dmz_is_readonly(zone) ||
> - dmz_is_rnd(zone))
> + dmz_is_readonly(zone))
> return 0;
>
> if (!dmz_is_empty(zone) || dmz_seq_write_err(zone)) {
>
Otherwise, looks good.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
--
dm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
