On 5/29/20 11:12 AM, Martin Wilck wrote:

On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 23:10 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
From: Björn Esser <besse...@fedoraproject.org>

TRUE/FALSE are not defined anymore.  1 and 0 are used instead.
This is backwards compatible, as earlier versions of json-c are
using the same integer values in their present definitions.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarz...@redhat.com>
---
  libdmmp/libdmmp_private.h | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/libdmmp/libdmmp_private.h b/libdmmp/libdmmp_private.h
index ac85b63f..4378962b 100644
--- a/libdmmp/libdmmp_private.h
+++ b/libdmmp/libdmmp_private.h
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static out_type func_name(struct dmmp_context *ctx,
const char *var_name) { \
  do { \
        json_type j_type = json_type_null; \
        json_object *j_obj_tmp = NULL; \
-       if (json_object_object_get_ex(j_obj, key, &j_obj_tmp) != TRUE)
{ \
+       if (json_object_object_get_ex(j_obj, key, &j_obj_tmp) != 1) { \
                _error(ctx, "Invalid JSON output from multipathd IPC: "
\
                       "key '%s' not found", key); \
                rc = DMMP_ERR_IPC_ERROR; \

Did you see
https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2020-May/msg00261.html ?

This has first been reported to the list by Christian (
https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2020-April/msg00261.html), and
brought to my attention later by Xose. I personally thought the change
from boolean to int is a step in the wrong direction, therefore I
submitted my modified version using stdboolh. If everyone else is fine
with the int, it's not worth arguing about it.

Regards,
Martin

PS: Can anyone explain why json-c did this? Looks like a "cause hassle
for downstream devs and users for no good reason" kind of thing to
me...


Add Eric Haszlakiewicz to CC.

Done at: 
https://github.com/json-c/json-c/commit/0992aac61f8b087efd7094e9ac2b84fa9c040fcd

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to