On Wed, 2020-09-02 at 15:18 +0800, lixiaokeng wrote:
> In cli_getprkey func, we use MALLOC instead of malloc, and check
> the return value of MALLOC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqian...@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lixiaokeng <lixiaok...@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Linfeilong <linfeil...@huawei.com>
> ---
>  multipathd/cli_handlers.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/multipathd/cli_handlers.c b/multipathd/cli_handlers.c
> index 27e4574f..d345afd3 100644
> --- a/multipathd/cli_handlers.c
> +++ b/multipathd/cli_handlers.c
> @@ -1535,7 +1535,11 @@ cli_getprkey(void * v, char ** reply, int *
> len, void * data)
>       if (!mpp)
>               return 1;
> 
> -     *reply = malloc(26);
> +     *reply = MALLOC(26);
> +     if (!*reply) {
> +             condlog(0, "malloc *reply failed.");
> +             return 1;
> +     }

MALLOC is not necessary (*reply isn't left uninialized), nor is the
error message.

Regards,
Martin


--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to