On Sat, 2020-08-22 at 00:42 +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Martin Wilck <[email protected]>
> 
> Hi Christophe, hi Ben,
> 
> embarassingly, it turns out that my unit test code for the bitfield
> code was broken in various ways, which at the same time shows that
> I didn't test this as broadly as I should have before submitting.
> The good news is that only the test code was broken, not the
> implementation itself.
> 
> With these fixes, I successfully compiled it on both little and
> big endian architectures, with and without glibc 2.27.
> (https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Base:System/multipath-tools)
> 
> Regards,
> Martin
> 
> Martin Wilck (3):
>   multipath-tools tests: fix bitfield tests for small fields
>   multipath-tools tests: fix bitfield tests for big endian
>   multipath-tools tests: fix small bitfield tests for big endian
> 
>  tests/util.c | 146 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> --
>  1 file changed, 120 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

@Ben: Gentle review reminder ...

Cheers,
Martin



--
dm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to