I see. Thanks.

On 9/29/20 12:03 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27 2020 at  8:04am -0400,
Jeffle Xu <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Mike, would you mind further expalin why bio processed by dm_wq_work()
always gets a previous ->submit_bio. Considering the following call graph:

->submit_bio, that is, dm_submit_bio
   DMF_BLOCK_IO_FOR_SUSPEND set, thus queue_io()

then worker thread dm_wq_work()
   dm_process_bio  // at this point. the input bio is the original bio
                      submitted to dm device

Please let me know if I missed something.

Thanks.
Jeffle
In general you have a valid point, that blk_queue_split() won't have
been done for the suspended device case, but blk_queue_split() cannot be
used if not in ->submit_bio -- IIUC you cannot just do it from a worker
thread and hope to have proper submission order (depth first) as
provided by __submit_bio_noacct().  Because this IO will be submitted
from worker you could have multiple threads allocating from the
q->bio_split mempool at the same time.

All said, I'm not quite sure how to address this report.  But I'll keep
at it and see what I can come up with.

Thanks,
Mike

Original commit log:
dm_process_bio() can be called by dm_wq_work(), and if the currently
processing bio is the very beginning bio submitted to the dm device,
that is it has not been handled by previous ->submit_bio, then we also
need to impose the queue_limits when it's in thread (dm_wq_work()).

Fixes: cf9c37865557 ("dm: fix comment in dm_process_bio()")
Fixes: 568c73a355e0 ("dm: update dm_process_bio() to split bio if in 
->make_request_fn()")
Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/md/dm.c | 16 ++++++----------
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
index 6ed05ca65a0f..54471c75ddef 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
@@ -1744,17 +1744,13 @@ static blk_qc_t dm_process_bio(struct mapped_device *md,
        }
/*
-        * If in ->submit_bio we need to use blk_queue_split(), otherwise
-        * queue_limits for abnormal requests (e.g. discard, writesame, etc)
-        * won't be imposed.
-        * If called from dm_wq_work() for deferred bio processing, bio
-        * was already handled by following code with previous ->submit_bio.
+        * Call blk_queue_split() so that queue_limits for abnormal requests
+        * (e.g. discard, writesame, etc) are ensured to be imposed, while
+        * it's not needed for regular IO, since regular IO will be split by
+        * following __split_and_process_bio.
         */
-       if (current->bio_list) {
-               if (is_abnormal_io(bio))
-                       blk_queue_split(&bio);
-               /* regular IO is split by __split_and_process_bio */
-       }
+       if (is_abnormal_io(bio))
+               blk_queue_split(&bio);
if (dm_get_md_type(md) == DM_TYPE_NVME_BIO_BASED)
                return __process_bio(md, map, bio, ti);
--
2.27.0


--
dm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to