On Thu 26-11-20 14:04:00, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Just call devcgroup_check_permission to avoid various superflous checks
> and a double conversion of the access flags.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>

Looks good. You can add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>

                                                                Honza

> ---
>  fs/block_dev.c | 10 ++++------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
> index d0783c55a0ce65..b12ab68297baf3 100644
> --- a/fs/block_dev.c
> +++ b/fs/block_dev.c
> @@ -1516,15 +1516,13 @@ static int blkdev_get(struct block_device *bdev, 
> fmode_t mode, void *holder)
>       struct block_device *claiming;
>       bool unblock_events = true;
>       struct gendisk *disk;
> -     int perm = 0;
>       int partno;
>       int ret;
>  
> -     if (mode & FMODE_READ)
> -             perm |= MAY_READ;
> -     if (mode & FMODE_WRITE)
> -             perm |= MAY_WRITE;
> -     ret = devcgroup_inode_permission(bdev->bd_inode, perm);
> +     ret = devcgroup_check_permission(DEVCG_DEV_BLOCK,
> +                     imajor(bdev->bd_inode), iminor(bdev->bd_inode),
> +                     ((mode & FMODE_READ) ? DEVCG_ACC_READ : 0) |
> +                     ((mode & FMODE_WRITE) ? DEVCG_ACC_WRITE : 0));
>       if (ret)
>               goto bdput;
>  
> -- 
> 2.29.2
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR

--
dm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to