On Thu 26-11-20 14:04:18, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Pass the block_device actually needed instead of looking it up using
> bdget_disk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>

Looks good. You can add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>

                                                                Honza

> ---
>  block/genhd.c | 13 +++----------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
> index 89cd0ba8e3b84a..28299b24173be1 100644
> --- a/block/genhd.c
> +++ b/block/genhd.c
> @@ -792,14 +792,8 @@ void device_add_disk_no_queue_reg(struct device *parent, 
> struct gendisk *disk)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(device_add_disk_no_queue_reg);
>  
> -static void invalidate_partition(struct gendisk *disk, int partno)
> +static void invalidate_partition(struct block_device *bdev)
>  {
> -     struct block_device *bdev;
> -
> -     bdev = bdget_disk(disk, partno);
> -     if (!bdev)
> -             return;
> -
>       fsync_bdev(bdev);
>       __invalidate_device(bdev, true);
>  
> @@ -808,7 +802,6 @@ static void invalidate_partition(struct gendisk *disk, 
> int partno)
>        * up any more even if openers still hold references to it.
>        */
>       remove_inode_hash(bdev->bd_inode);
> -     bdput(bdev);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -853,12 +846,12 @@ void del_gendisk(struct gendisk *disk)
>       disk_part_iter_init(&piter, disk,
>                            DISK_PITER_INCL_EMPTY | DISK_PITER_REVERSE);
>       while ((part = disk_part_iter_next(&piter))) {
> -             invalidate_partition(disk, part->bdev->bd_partno);
> +             invalidate_partition(part->bdev);
>               delete_partition(part);
>       }
>       disk_part_iter_exit(&piter);
>  
> -     invalidate_partition(disk, 0);
> +     invalidate_partition(disk->part0);
>       set_capacity(disk, 0);
>       disk->flags &= ~GENHD_FL_UP;
>       up_write(&bdev_lookup_sem);
> -- 
> 2.29.2
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR

--
dm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to