On Wed, 2021-02-03 at 09:33 +0800, lixiaokeng wrote: > > > On 2021/2/3 3:57, [email protected] wrote: > > From: Martin Wilck <[email protected]> > > > > The description of 2d32d6f ("libmultipath: adopt_paths(): don't > > bail out on > > single path failure") said "we need to check after successful call > > to > > adopt_paths() if that specific path had been actually added, and > > fail in the > > caller otherwise". But the commit failed to actually implement this > > check. > > Instead, it just checked if the path was member of the pathvec, > > which will > > almost always be the case. > > > > Fix it by checking what actually needs to be checked, membership of > > the > > path to be added in mpp->paths. > > > > Fixes: 2d32d6f ("libmultipath: adopt_paths(): don't bail out on > > single path failure") > > Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <[email protected]> > > --- > > > > @lixiaokeng, I believe that this fixes the issue you mentioned in > > your > > post "libmultipath: fix NULL dereference in get_be64". > > Reviewed-by: Lixiaokeng <[email protected]>
Is this also a Tested-by:? IOW, did it fix your issue? Martin -- dm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
