---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:36:51 -0500 (EST)
From: Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]>
To: David Teigland <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Zdenek Kabelac <[email protected]>,
    Marian Csontos <[email protected]>, [email protected],
    [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH] blk-settings: make sure that max_sectors is aligned on
    "logical_block_size" boundary.

We get these I/O errors when we run md-raid1 on the top of dm-integrity on 
the top of ramdisk:
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xff00, 0xff
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xff00, 0xff
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xffff, 0x1
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0xffff, 0x1
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8048, 0xff
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8147, 0xff
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8246, 0xff
device-mapper: integrity: Bio not aligned on 8 sectors: 0x8345, 0xbb

The ramdisk device has logical_block_size 512 and max_sectors 255. The 
dm-integrity device uses logical_block_size 4096 and it doesn't affect the 
"max_sectors" value - thus, it inherits 255 from the ramdisk. So, we have 
a device with max_sectors not aligned on logical_block_size.

The md-raid device sees that the underlying leg has max_sectors 255 and it
will split the bios on 255-sector boundary, making the bios unaligned on
logical_block_size.

In order to fix the bug, we round down max_sectors to logical_block_size.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]

---
 block/blk-settings.c |   10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

Index: linux-2.6/block/blk-settings.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/block/blk-settings.c 2020-10-29 12:20:46.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/block/blk-settings.c      2020-11-19 21:20:18.000000000 +0100
@@ -591,6 +591,16 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits
                ret = -1;
        }
 
+       t->max_sectors = round_down(t->max_sectors, t->logical_block_size / 
512);
+       if (t->max_sectors < PAGE_SIZE / 512)
+               t->max_sectors = PAGE_SIZE / 512;
+       t->max_hw_sectors = round_down(t->max_hw_sectors, t->logical_block_size 
/ 512);
+       if (t->max_sectors < PAGE_SIZE / 512)
+               t->max_hw_sectors = PAGE_SIZE / 512;
+       t->max_dev_sectors = round_down(t->max_dev_sectors, 
t->logical_block_size / 512);
+       if (t->max_sectors < PAGE_SIZE / 512)
+               t->max_dev_sectors = PAGE_SIZE / 512;
+
        /* Discard alignment and granularity */
        if (b->discard_granularity) {
                alignment = queue_limit_discard_alignment(b, start);

--
dm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to