On 2021/05/26 4:50, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> The functions set_bit and clear_bit are atomic. We don't need atomicity
> when making flags for dm-kcopyd. So, change them to direct manipulation of
> the flags.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]>
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-kcopyd.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/dm-kcopyd.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-kcopyd.c
> @@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ void dm_kcopyd_copy(struct dm_kcopyd_cli
>       if (!test_bit(DM_KCOPYD_WRITE_SEQ, &job->flags)) {
>               for (i = 0; i < job->num_dests; i++) {
>                       if (bdev_zoned_model(dests[i].bdev) == BLK_ZONED_HM) {
> -                             set_bit(DM_KCOPYD_WRITE_SEQ, &job->flags);
> +                             job->flags |= 1UL << DM_KCOPYD_WRITE_SEQ;

How about using the BIT() macro ?

job->flags |= BIT(DM_KCOPYD_WRITE_SEQ);

But I know some do not like that macro :)


>                               break;
>                       }
>               }
> @@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ void dm_kcopyd_copy(struct dm_kcopyd_cli
>        */
>       if (test_bit(DM_KCOPYD_WRITE_SEQ, &job->flags) &&
>           test_bit(DM_KCOPYD_IGNORE_ERROR, &job->flags))
> -             clear_bit(DM_KCOPYD_IGNORE_ERROR, &job->flags);
> +             job->flags &= ~(1UL << DM_KCOPYD_IGNORE_ERROR);
>  
>       if (from) {
>               job->source = *from;
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-raid1.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/dm-raid1.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-raid1.c
> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static void recover(struct mirror_set *m
>  
>       /* hand to kcopyd */
>       if (!errors_handled(ms))
> -             set_bit(DM_KCOPYD_IGNORE_ERROR, &flags);
> +             flags |= 1UL << DM_KCOPYD_IGNORE_ERROR;
>  
>       dm_kcopyd_copy(ms->kcopyd_client, &from, ms->nr_mirrors - 1, to,
>                      flags, recovery_complete, reg);
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-zoned-reclaim.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/dm-zoned-reclaim.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-zoned-reclaim.c
> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static int dmz_reclaim_copy(struct dmz_r
>       dst_zone_block = dmz_start_block(zmd, dst_zone);
>  
>       if (dmz_is_seq(dst_zone))
> -             set_bit(DM_KCOPYD_WRITE_SEQ, &flags);
> +             flags |= 1UL << DM_KCOPYD_WRITE_SEQ;
>  
>       while (block < end_block) {
>               if (src_zone->dev->flags & DMZ_BDEV_DYING)
> 
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Either way, looks fine to me.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research



--
dm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to