On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 06:35:49PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> +     /*
> +      * Only support bio polling for normal IO, and the target io is
> +      * exactly inside the dm io instance
> +      */
> +     ci->io->submit_as_polled = !!(ci->bio->bi_opf & REQ_POLLED);

Nit: the !! is not needed.

> @@ -1608,6 +1625,22 @@ static void init_clone_info(struct clone_info *ci, 
> struct mapped_device *md,
>       ci->map = map;
>       ci->io = alloc_io(md, bio);
>       ci->sector = bio->bi_iter.bi_sector;
> +
> +     if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_POLLED) {
> +             INIT_HLIST_NODE(&ci->io->node);
> +
> +             /*
> +              * Save .bi_end_io into dm_io, so that we can reuse .bi_end_io
> +              * for storing dm_io list
> +              */
> +             if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_SAVED_END_IO) {
> +                     ci->io->saved_bio_end_io = NULL;

So if it already was saved the list gets cleared here?  Can you explain
this logic a little more?

> +             } else {
> +                     ci->io->saved_bio_end_io = bio->bi_end_io;
> +                     INIT_HLIST_HEAD((struct hlist_head *)&bio->bi_end_io);

I think you want to hide these casts in helpers that clearly document
why this is safe rather than sprinkling the casts all over the code.
I also wonder if there is any better way to structur this.

> +static int dm_poll_bio(struct bio *bio, unsigned int flags)
> +{
> +     struct dm_io *io;
> +     void *saved_bi_end_io = NULL;
> +     struct hlist_head tmp = HLIST_HEAD_INIT;
> +     struct hlist_head *head = (struct hlist_head *)&bio->bi_end_io;
> +     struct hlist_node *next;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * This bio can be submitted from FS as POLLED so that FS may keep
> +      * polling even though the flag is cleared by bio splitting or
> +      * requeue, so return immediately.
> +      */
> +     if (!(bio->bi_opf & REQ_POLLED))
> +             return 0;

I can't really parse the comment, can you explain this a little more?
But if we need this check, shouldn't it move to bio_poll()?

> +     hlist_for_each_entry(io, &tmp, node) {
> +             if (io->saved_bio_end_io && !saved_bi_end_io) {
> +                     saved_bi_end_io = io->saved_bio_end_io;
> +                     break;
> +             }
> +     }

So it seems like you don't use bi_cookie at all.  Why not turn
bi_cookie into a union to stash the hlist_head and use that?

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to