Mikulas, On Tue, 10 Aug 2021, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]> > thank you for the review. After looking at the submitted patch again, seems more proper to use >= as the condition: > > + if (unlikely(percpu_counter_read_positive(&cc->n_allocated_pages) > > > dm_crypt_pages_per_client) && ^^ >= Would it be okay if I resend the patch with this changed and add your Reviewed-by still? Would also fix some wording in the description and dedent the perf report output somewhat. Thanks, Arne -- dm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
