On Wed, Sep 29 2021 at 12:35P -0400, Eric Biggers <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]> > > For clarity, avoid using just the "blk_crypto_" prefix for functions and > structs that are specific to blk-crypto-fallback. Instead, use > "blk_crypto_fallback_". Some places already did this, but others > didn't. > > This is also a prerequisite for using "struct blk_crypto_keyslot" to > mean a generic blk-crypto keyslot (which is what it sounds like). > Rename the fallback one to "struct blk_crypto_fallback_keyslot". > > No change in behavior. > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <[email protected]> -- dm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
