On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 02:31:45PM -0700, Jane Chu wrote:
> +int dax_prep_recovery(struct dax_device *dax_dev, void **kaddr)
> +{
> +     if (dax_recovery_capable(dax_dev)) {
> +             set_bit(DAXDEV_RECOVERY, (unsigned long *)kaddr);
> +             return 0;
> +     }
> +     return -EINVAL;

Setting a random bit on a passed in memory address looks a little
dangerous to me.

Also I'd return early for the EINVAL case to make the flow a little
more clear.

Reply via email to