On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 02:31:49PM -0700, Jane Chu wrote:
> +typedef size_t (*iter_func_t)(struct dax_device *dax_dev, pgoff_t pgoff,
> +             void *addr, size_t bytes, struct iov_iter *i);
>  static loff_t dax_iomap_iter(const struct iomap_iter *iomi,
>               struct iov_iter *iter)
>  {
> @@ -1210,6 +1212,7 @@ static loff_t dax_iomap_iter(const struct iomap_iter 
> *iomi,
>       ssize_t ret = 0;
>       size_t xfer;
>       int id;
> +     iter_func_t write_func = dax_copy_from_iter;

This use of a function pointer causes indirect call overhead.  A simple
"bool in_recovery" or do_recovery does the trick in a way that is
both more readable and generates faster code.

> +             if ((map_len == -EIO) && (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE)) {

No need for the braces.

>               if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE)
> -                     xfer = dax_copy_from_iter(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr,
> -                                     map_len, iter);
> +                     xfer = write_func(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr, map_len, iter);
>               else
>                       xfer = dax_copy_to_iter(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr,
>                                       map_len, iter);

i.e.

                if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == READ)
                        xfer = dax_copy_to_iter(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr,
                                        map_len, iter);
                else if (unlikely(do_recovery))
                        xfer = dax_recovery_write(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr,
                                        map_len, iter);
                else
                        xfer = dax_copy_from_iter(dax_dev, pgoff, kaddr,
                                        map_len, iter);

Reply via email to