Hi David,

On 2022-05-09 20:54, David Sterba wrote:>> diff --git
a/drivers/md/dm-zone.c b/drivers/md/dm-zone.c
>> index 3e7b1fe15..27dc4ddf2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/dm-zone.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-zone.c
>> @@ -231,6 +231,18 @@ static int dm_revalidate_zones(struct mapped_device 
>> *md, struct dm_table *t)
>>      struct request_queue *q = md->queue;
>>      unsigned int noio_flag;
>>      int ret;
>> +    struct block_device *bdev = md->disk->part0;
>> +    sector_t zone_sectors;
>> +    char bname[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
>> +
>> +    zone_sectors = bdev_zone_sectors(bdev);
>> +
>> +    if (!is_power_of_2(zone_sectors)) {
> 
> is_power_of_2 takes 'unsigned long' and sector_t is u64, so this is not
> 32bit clean and we had an actual bug where value 1<<48 was not
> recognized as power of 2.
> 
Good catch. Now I understand why btrfs has a helper for is_power_of_two_u64.

But the zone size can never be more than 32bit value so the zone size
sect will never greater than unsigned long.

With that said, we have two options:

1.) We can put a comment explaining that even though it is 32 bit
unsafe, zone size sect can never be a 32bit value

or

2) We should move the btrfs only helper `is_power_of_two_u64` to some
common header and use it everywhere.

Let me know your thoughts.

--
dm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to