On first corruption the verity targets triggers a "dm_target_update" event.
This allows other systems to detect the corruption via IMA instead of
manually querying the table. The corruption cannot be detected using the
other IMA measurements because "dm_table_load" only measures the table
content during target creation. Using the new "dm_target_update" remeasures
the target table entries during runtime.

The event is only triggered if the target was not corrupted before because
verity_handle_err(..) is still called when the target is corrupted and the
IMA log should only contain an entry when the table changed.

Signed-off-by: Thore Sommer <[email protected]>
---
 - v1: rewrite check to not use an extra variable

 drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
index 80133aae0db3..5133c2274057 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include "dm-verity.h"
 #include "dm-verity-fec.h"
 #include "dm-verity-verify-sig.h"
+#include "dm-ima.h"
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/reboot.h>
 #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
@@ -219,8 +220,13 @@ static int verity_handle_err(struct dm_verity *v, enum 
verity_block_type type,
        const char *type_str = "";
        struct mapped_device *md = dm_table_get_md(v->ti->table);
 
-       /* Corruption should be visible in device status in all modes */
-       v->hash_failed = 1;
+       /* Only change and measure change if not already corrupted */
+       if (!v->hash_failed) {
+               /* Corruption should be visible in device status in all modes */
+               v->hash_failed = 1;
+               /* After the state has changed remeasure target table */
+               dm_ima_measure_on_target_update(v->ti);
+       }
 
        if (v->corrupted_errs >= DM_VERITY_MAX_CORRUPTED_ERRS)
                goto out;
-- 
2.36.0

--
dm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

Reply via email to