On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 09:24:24PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Le 02/07/2022 à 20:54, Andy Shevchenko a écrit : > > On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 08:29:09PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
... > > > - memset(set->bitmap, 0, bitmap_size(num_ssid, num_id)); > > > + memset(set->bitmap, 0, idset_bitmap_size(num_ssid, num_id)); > > > > Why not to use bitmap_zero()? ... > > > - memset(set->bitmap, 0xff, bitmap_size(set->num_ssid, set->num_id)); > > > + memset(set->bitmap, 0xff, idset_bitmap_size(set->num_ssid, > > > set->num_id)); > > > > Why not to use bitmap_fill() ? > For this initial step, I wanted to keep changes as minimal as possible (i.e > just function renaming) > > In fact, I plan to send a follow-up patch on this file. > This would remove the newly renamed idset_bitmap_size() function, use the > bitmap API directly (as you pointed-out) with > "set->num_ssid * set->num_id" as size. > > It is already done this way in idset_is_empty(), so it would be more > consistent. > > If the serie needs a v2 (or if required), I can add an additional 5th patch > for it. Otherwise it will send separatly later. If you use bitmap APIs as I suggested above as the first patch, the rest will have less unneeded churn, no? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- dm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
