On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 09:33:16AM +0100, Pankaj Raghav wrote:
> Use the bdev_offset_from_zone_start() helper function to calculate
> the offset from zone start instead of open coding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Raghav <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-zone.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-zone.c b/drivers/md/dm-zone.c
> index 3dafc0e8b7a9..ac6fc1293d41 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-zone.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-zone.c
> @@ -390,7 +390,8 @@ static bool dm_zone_map_bio_begin(struct mapped_device
> *md,
> case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
> case REQ_OP_WRITE:
> /* Writes must be aligned to the zone write pointer */
> - if ((clone->bi_iter.bi_sector & (zsectors - 1)) != zwp_offset)
> + if (bdev_offset_from_zone_start(md->disk->part0,
> + clone->bi_iter.bi_sector) !=
> zwp_offset)
I can't see how this actually cleans antyhing up, while it does add an
overly long line.
> if (clone->bi_status == BLK_STS_OK &&
> bio_op(clone) == REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND) {
> orig_bio->bi_iter.bi_sector +=
> - clone->bi_iter.bi_sector & mask;
> + bdev_offset_from_zone_start(disk->part0,
> clone->bi_iter.bi_sector);
Same here.
--
dm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
