On 7/6/12 7:27 PM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>Given that: >> >> * Whitelisting mailing lists is really the only way to get DMARC to >>work with messages forwarded by lists. > >I don¹t agree with the premise that this is something about which we need >to be concerned on this project. Who gets phished via mailing lists? > >#Chris's reply ># ># I want to put this to rest as much as you do. What is the expected >behavior ># for lists that are established versus ones that are new and unlisted to >all ># receivers. This is how a spammer could pose as a list and I see it as >relevant . ># > How would a receiver distinguish between an established list versus one that is new versus one that is unlisted? What would a spammer posing as a list gain him or her? -MSK > _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
