Not at the moment. It needs to be reviewed and ratified by the DMARC.org team, and we have some issues we're still discussing.
-MSK On 10/7/12 5:10 PM, "Michael Stevens" <[email protected]> wrote: >Any idea when the next version will be available? > >On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:10:22PM +0000, Murray Kucherawy wrote: >> Fixed in the next version. >> >> -MSK >> >> On 10/3/12 3:12 PM, "Michael Stevens" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >Another one I just found, the BNF doesn't seem to permit the last field >> >to end with a dmarc-sep, but this seems like a desirable sort of thing >> >to allow. >> > >> >Michael >> > >> >On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 09:49:03PM +0000, Murray Kucherawy wrote: >> >> Nope, you're right, it's a bug in the doc. It'll be fixed in the >>next >> >> version. >> >> >> >> This is the right place to report such problems. So, thanks for the >> >> report! >> >> >> >> -MSK >> >> >> >> On 10/3/12 1:58 PM, "Michael Stevens" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >Hi. >> >> > >> >> >I'm working on implementing a dmarc record parser from >> >> >http://www.dmarc.org/draft-dmarc-base-00-02.txt >> >> > >> >> >The BNF for dmarc-ainterval looks wrong: >> >> > >> >> > dmarc-ainterval = %x72.69 *WSP "=" *WSP >> >> > >> >> >on page 21. >> >> > >> >> >Presumably this should allow a number after the final *WSP? >> >> > >> >> >Is this the best place to report problems? >> >> > >> >> >I'm experimentally allowing \d+ there. >> >> > >> >> >Michael >> >> >_______________________________________________ >> >> >dmarc-discuss mailing list >> >> >[email protected] >> >> >http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss >> >> > >> >> >NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note >>Well >> >> >terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> dmarc-discuss mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss >> >> >> >> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note >>Well >> >>terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >> >_______________________________________________ >> >dmarc-discuss mailing list >> >[email protected] >> >http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss >> > >> >NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well >> >terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmarc-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss >> >> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well >>terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
