On Oct 29, 2012, at 12:18 AM, Zachary Harris <[email protected]> wrote: > I wouldwish to throw in my two cents suggesting that such future work on this > topic consider the possibility that, before too many others choose to follow > in step with Microsoft's and Google's leads as currently implemented, it > might be prudent to assess the likelihood that the trust level assertions > accompanying said icons are too strong.
Well said! Receivers should consider the strength of the underlying key before attaching a "Trust Indicator". OpenDKIM now ships with a default "MinKeyBits" of 1024, and companies are reevaluating their DKIM deployments. Progress! =- Tim
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
