On Nov 6, 2012, at 11:02 AM, "John Levine" <[email protected]> wrote: > Nobody wants to deliver phish messages, but they don't want to lose > legitimate messages due to over-strict phish heuristics either. But > in view of the extremely small fraction of mail that's missing From:, > I don't see it as a big deal either way.
We're way off in the weeds now, so I'll self-moderate and leave this behind. My original point was that operators should measure how much legitimate email they're accepting that is sans a From: header, and put in controls if they can. The last time this was measured (as there are people on the list that can and do look at data before making decisions), the number was very tiny where it existed at all. HTH, =- Tim _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
