sure ­ connected you off-list. again ­ my thinking here is this is just
related to what will appear as downsampling. good luck!

From:  Olga Gavrylyako <[email protected]>
Date:  Thursday, November 29, 2012 9:47 AM
To:  Paul Midgen <[email protected]>
Cc:  Franck Martin <[email protected]>, Sam Patrick
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject:  Re: [dmarc-discuss] Hotmail Email Rejection for DMARC senders

> Hi Paul,
> Maybe you have some incentives, or maybe can refer to somebody in
> Hotmail. From reports, they send to Gmail I see that they fail to
> authenticate 100% of all our mail (google.com, youtube.com,
> plus.google.com).
> Also reported volumes look too low.
> Wandering if it is just a reporting bug...
> 
> Olga
> 
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Paul Midgen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>  when i worked on this stuff at hotmail, standard procedure was to do a
>>  staged rollout over a longish period of time so that we could measure the
>>  impact to production servers and so on. what this looks like from the
>>  outside is dmarc being applied  using a gradually increasing sample rate.
>>  messages sampled out look like p=none, the rest whatever your policy is.
>> 
>>  hotmail has has private-channel dmarc for long enough time that the
>>  none/quarantine/reject semantics are fairly well understood.
>> 
>>  i don't know if any of my former colleagues are on this list, so i've
>>  forwarded the thread on to them to see if they have more to add. i don't
>>  know what's changed procedurally since i left.
>> 
>>  -p
>> 
>>  From: Franck Martin <[email protected]>
>>  Date: Thursday, November 29, 2012 12:08 AM
>>  To: Sam Patrick <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
>>  <[email protected]>
>>  Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] Hotmail Email Rejection for DMARC senders
>> 
>>  This is just guess work. I think hotmail is still ramping up/implementing,
>>  so it may likely be they apply lower forms of the policy till they are
>>  confident there is no serious bugs.
>> 
>>  From: Sam Patrick <[email protected]>
>>  Reply-To: Sam Patrick <[email protected]>
>>  Date: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 10:08 PM
>>  To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>  Subject: [dmarc-discuss] Hotmail Email Rejection for DMARC senders
>> 
>>  We have recently setup DMARC in our DNS and all the spam/ phishing emails
>>  (fake emails using our brand name) are getting blocked in Gmail, Yahoo, AOL
>>  etc but, these emails are still landing in the SPAM folder of Hotmail.
>> 
>>  Please let me know if Hotmail is following DMARC 'reject' rules and policies
>>  while accepting emails.
>> 
>>  Regards,
>>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>  Sam Patrick
>>  Domain Admin
>> 
>>  [email protected]
>> 
>>  123Greetings.com, Inc.
>>  1674 Broadway, Suite 403
>>  New York, NY 10019
>> 
>>  http://www.123greetings.com
>>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>  _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list
>>  [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>>  NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
>>  terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
>> 
>> 
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  dmarc-discuss mailing list
>>  [email protected]
>>  http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>> 
>>  NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
>>  terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
>> 
> 


_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to