According to their website it's no longer required to fill the SenderID form. That probably means they're no longer using offline cache.
https://support.msn.com/eform.aspx?productKey=senderid&page=support_senderid_options_form_ -- Vic On Dec 14, 2012 11:39 PM, "Scott Kitterman" <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, but it wouldn't surprise me if they adapted their existing > architecture/code base. > > Scott K > > Henrik Schack <[email protected]> wrote: > > >They seem to have moved on, I just found this article > > > http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2012/12/hotmail-moves-to-spf-authentication/ > >I guess something needs a little tweaking in their setup ? > > > >Best regards > >Henrik Schack > > > > > > > >On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Scott Kitterman > ><[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> Hotmail's original (~2006) Sender ID implementation used an offline > >DNS > >> cache and would return temperror if your record was not already in > >the > >> cache. For small senders there was an address you could email to get > >your > >> record added to the cache. > >> > >> Perhaps they still are using such a design? > >> > >> Scott K > >> > >> Henrik Schack <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> >Ahh it seems to be Hotmail being unable to retrieve our SPF record > >:-( > >> > > >> >Best regards > >> >Henrik Schack > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Henrik Schack <[email protected]> > >> >wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi > >> >> I have seen a lot of SPF temperrors in my DMARC reports the last > >few > >> >days, > >> >> Am I the only one with this problem ? Domain in question is tdc.dk > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Best regards > >> >> Henrik Schack > >> >> IT-specialist > >> >> TDC A/S > >> >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> dmarc-discuss mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > >> > >> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note > >Well > >> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) > >> > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well > terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
