Hey Olga. Where is this smtp-time generated? Is it the response from your servers when the message is delivered?
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Olga Gavrylyako <[email protected]> wrote: > If your message failed authentication and we are applying "quarantine" > DMARC policy, we generate a message smtp-time. > The smtp-reply in this case is: > OK, DMARC:Quarantine > Hopefully it will help debugging. > > Olga > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Matias Kruk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Are you trying to say that when you send mail to Gmail it goes to spam, >>> or that when you receive mail from Gmail it goes to spam? >> >> I'm sending emails and goes to spam folder. >> >>> If your mail to gmail goes to spam, speaking as somebody who knows >>> nothing of the internals of gmail but can guess based on, umm, other large >>> mail systems, I suggest that this is not related to DMARC unless you are >>> asking from quarantine and having errors. >> >> I set DMARC as monitor mode. So It's not possible that DMARC marke them >> as spam. >> >>> However, if the users don't like your mail, DMARC will not save it >>> from the spam folder. >> >> I think that's the point. But I wanted to be sure that it wasn't DMARC >> issue. >> Thanks! >> >> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Elizabeth Zwicky >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >>> Are you trying to say that when you send mail to Gmail it goes to spam, >>> or that when you receive mail from Gmail it goes to spam? >>> >>> If your mail to gmail goes to spam, speaking as somebody who knows >>> nothing of the internals of gmail but can guess based on, umm, other large >>> mail systems, I suggest that this is not related to DMARC unless you are >>> asking from quarantine and having errors. However, if the users don't like >>> your mail, DMARC will not save it from the spam folder. >>> >>> Elizabeth >>> >>> On Dec 20, 2012, at 5:24 AM, Matias Kruk wrote: >>> >>> You mean reports from Google to you? => The reports are OK. Here is a the >>> screen capture <http://awesomescreenshot.com/05fqg4b83>. Maybe the >>> report is warn me of something but I don't follow it. >>> If your spam filter is mis-classifying them as spam then presumably you >>> need to adjust your spam filter? => Yes, possible. Or the list should need >>> a cleaning up. >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Roland Turner < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> You mean reports from Google to you? If your spam filter is >>>> mis-classifying them as spam then presumably you need to adjust your spam >>>> filter? >>>> >>>> - Roland >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 20/12/2012 07:33, Matias Kruk wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Benny. So problem would be recipient? It's not related with DMARC, >>>> right? >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Benny Pedersen <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Matias Kruk skrev den 20-12-2012 00:07: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, I moved to DMARC since a couple of days ago. The reports show us >>>>>> we're good! >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> But now the incoming messages from gmail are sent to SPAM! It didn't >>>>>> happen previously. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> What's wrong? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ask recipient ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> dmarc-discuss mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss >>>>> >>>>> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note >>>>> Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Inf. Eng. Matias Kruk >>>> Skype: matiaslkruk >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> dmarc-discuss mailing >>>> [email protected]http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss >>>> >>>> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well >>>> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Roland Turner | Director, Labs >>>> TrustSphere Pte Ltd | 3 Phillip Street #13-03, Singapore 048693 >>>> Mobile: +65 96700022 | Skype: roland.turner >>>> [email protected] | http://www.trustsphere.com/ >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Inf. Eng. Matias Kruk >>> Skype: matiaslkruk >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dmarc-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss >>> >>> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well >>> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Inf. Eng. Matias Kruk >> Skype: matiaslkruk >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmarc-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss >> >> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well >> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >> >> > -- Inf. Eng. Matias Kruk Skype: matiaslkruk
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
