John, Thanks, and sorry for pulling your leg.
To conclude on a funny note: http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/<http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/list.html> (from 2003) and less funny (because they did not add a picture) http://www.economist.com/node/18529895 Disclaimer: This message represents the official view of the voices in my head From: John Sweet <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, January 10, 2013 3:03 PM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [dmarc-discuss] (no subject) > Then this person is personally liable to go against his/her company policy? > > Let direct the threat in the right direction :P > > I suggest we unsubscribe this person from the mailing list to protect this > group. Please allow me to apologize for any consternation my employer's legal boilerplate may have caused any of you. That person ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) is now unsubscribed from dmarc-discuss. (By the absence of any legal boilerplate from this message, you may conclude that you are free to do anything at all with its contents.)
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
