On Friday, March 15, 2013 03:42:30 PM Stephen Nightingale wrote: > I'm forwarding this message to the DMARC list since there is no action > on the dkim-dev list. > Cheers, > Stephen Nightingale, NIST. > > -------- Original Message -------- > Anybody else got this issue with dkimpy and null body? > > When I receive a message signed with sha256, using relaxed/relaxed > canonicalization over a null body, the verify method comes back with: > frcCV1k9oG9oKj3dpUqdJg1PxRT2RSN/XKdLCPjaYaY (per RFC6376 3.4.3 page 16, > the result for 'simple') > though it should be: > 47DEQpj8HBSa+/TImW+5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU (per RFC6376 3.4.4 Page 17, > the result for 'relaxed'). > > It would trace to the dkim/canonicalization.py module. Is it a known > problem and is there a known fix?
What version are you running and please file a bug with the details here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dkimpy/+filebug I don't know of any bugs that would cause that with the current version (0.5.3). Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
