I have written a DMARC plugin for qpsmtpd which is another variant (and drop
in) replacement for good old qmail - This I will happily share. I have yet
to complete the reporting part, but that could potentially be done in joint
co-operation if anyone is interested?

Regards,
Jesper

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Levine
Sent: 6. marts 2013 04:47
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] Qmail and DMARC

In article <30969366.e2Kjts2YOV@scott-latitude-e6320> you write:
>I think it's safe to say that QMail users aren't scared by old software.

Now, now, you have no idea what we do.  Some of that software is old
because there's no reason to change software that isn't broken.

As I told Steve in private mail, many qmail setups use an open source
SMTP daemon called mailfront that is a drop-in replacement for the
standard qmail-smtpd but does all the stuff that modern SMTP daemons
need to do, starting with rejecting undeliverable addresses in the
SMTP session.  It has a nice plugin architecture using .so files
written in C and it's really fast.  I've written mailfront plugins for
greylisting, spamassassin, mysql logging, and other stuff I forget.

On my very long list of things to do eventually is to write mailfront
plugins for opendkim and libspf and, I suppose, opendmarc.  I don't
think it'd be very hard, probably under a week for a reasonably
competent C programmer.  I'm not volunteering, but if someone wanted
it done, I could suggest some people who could do it.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)


_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss

NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms 
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

Reply via email to