Thanks, Olga. Your response helped :) This list definitely gives an amazing platform to voice concerns and feedback which would otherwise get lost.
Cheers! On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:25 PM, J. Trent Adams <[email protected]>wrote: > > I just wanted to take a moment to thank everyone on this list for their > participation in the conversation. > > Folks like Anshul bringing up problems and then Olga closing the loop > like this is why the list exists. The operational experience and > responsiveness of this community is really amazing. > > Thank you all for your ongoing contributions. > > Yours, > Trent > > > On 7/25/13 10:40 AM, Olga Gavrylyako wrote: > > Hi Anshul, > > We had a bug, where in > > <spf> > > <domain>pm.mtasv.net <http://pm.mtasv.net></domain> > > <result>pass</result> > > </spf> > > > > we reported result of spf pass for DMARC authentication (spf pass + > > alignment), instead of just raw SPF pass. We fixed it this week and > > rolling to production. You are lucky, you hit the day where both > > reporting version were alive at some moment of time :) > > Starting tomorrow, there will be no such discrepancy. > > Olga > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Anshul Agrawal > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Attaching the Aggregate Report received today from Google. The SPF > > 'auth_results' are marked as 'fail' for all the IPs however it > > should pass. Yahoo and Hotmail reports it fine. > > > > For auth_results, RFC says "This element contains DKIM and SPF > > results, uninterpreted with respect to DMARC." > > > > Can someone help identify the issue? Attaching the aggregated > > report from google and hotmail. > > > > Thanks, > > Anshul > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Anshul Agrawal > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > I have turned on the DMARC in monitor mode and started > > receiving the reports from Yahoo, Google, and Hotmail. The > > third party ESP we use has proper SPF records in place and > > uses our DKIM ket to sign the mail. > > > > Google seems to report, for the same IP and 'Return-Path' > > domain, SPF fail and pass in the same report. Moreover, one > > day, all the IPs were reported to fail the SPF check. > > > > Note that in the below messages, SPF checks fail for far more > > number of times than it is regarded as pass. However, all the > > test mails that I have sent to Gmail, all of them show SPF > > pass so far when I check headers and have never failed. > > > > <record> > > <row> > > <source_ip>50.31.156.116</source_ip> > > <count>15</count> > > ... > > ... > > <spf> > > <domain>pm.mtasv.net <http://pm.mtasv.net></domain> > > <result>fail</result> > > </spf> > > </auth_results> > > </record> > > > > And > > > > <record> > > <row> > > <source_ip>50.31.156.116</source_ip> > > <count>2</count> > > ... > > ... > > <spf> > > <domain>pm.mtasv.net <http://pm.mtasv.net></domain> > > <result>pass</result> > > </spf> > > </auth_results> > > </record> > > > > IMHO given the same IP and domain, SPF check should not fail > > for some pass for other requests (given the DNS records are > > not updated) > > > > Am I missing something? > > > > Thanks, > > Anshul > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dmarc-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note > > Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dmarc-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well > terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) > > -- > J. Trent Adams > > Profile: http://www.mediaslate.org/jtrentadams/ > LinkedIN: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jtrentadams > Twitter: http://twitter.com/jtrentadams > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well > terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
