On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Jeff Macdonald < [email protected]> wrote:
> If we are inventing new extended codes, I would rather see support for > this: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-macdonald-antispam-registry-02 > > This was created before DMARC, and there really isn't anything in there > that would be a good match at the moment, but we can obviously extend it. > I seem to recall this was discussed on apps-discuss, but I can't find the thread now. What little feedback was mainly doubt as to the likely adoption of these codes because it provides attackers with too much information about what local policies are in effect. I suggest this conversation be moved to [email protected] or even [email protected]. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
