Interesting enough Leith, the very email I'm replying to was put into my gmail spam.. Every few days I find dmarc list mail in my spam folder due to quarantine/reject policies. Franck's emails always seem to get through though despite LinkedIn's reject policy..
On 15 August 2013 14:47, Leith Bade <[email protected]> wrote: > Just noticed this entire thread was sent to spam on my Google Apps account. > > Now analyzing the headers, Google detects agari.com with a DMARC failure > and a policy of none, so should have stuck at least this first email in my > Inbox (SPF/DKIM passes). > > The second two replies from tnpi.net and linkedin.com are both marked as > DMARC failure but with a policy of reject - so I would have expected those > emails to go to spam. > > However all three emails went to spam (in the same Gmail thread) including > the agari.com email. > > I am speculating that the first email may have landed in my Inbox, but the > second two emails went to spam, magically tagging the entire thread as > spam. Of course I was not looking at the Inbox during this time so Google > would have been able to reclassify the emails without bothering me. (I > assume the Gmail can do Houdini tricks to spam that makes it past there > filters and is then reported by other people etc.) > > I'm sure the Googlers are watching so they will know what actually > happened. Perhaps a tweak is that if the first email in a thread (or other > emails in that thread) that make it through as not spam should tag the > mailing list replies that fail DMARC as suitable subjects for a mailing > list policy override. > > Thanks, > Leith Bade > [email protected] > > > On 15 August 2013 09:34, Tomki Camp <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello DMARC reporting implementors, >> I've come across an interesting tidbit I wanted to ping you on : the >> DMARC spec allows that a domain may publish a URI such as ' >> [email protected]!20m', to specify that the address will only payloads of >> up to 20 megabytes. Does your implementation support this? >> >> Section 5.1: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base/?include_text=1 >> >> >> Thanks! >> *Tomki Camp, Agari Director of Support* >> [email protected] l M: 415.779.2854 l www.agari.com >> *Learn who is most vulnerable to cybercrime in **the Agari Q2 TrustIndex >> here <http://info.agari.com/agari-email-trust-index-q2-2013>* >> *Sign up for our webinar **8 Steps to DMARC >> **here*<http://info.agari.com/agari-weekly-webinar-sign-up> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmarc-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss >> >> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well >> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss > > NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well > terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html) > > -- Regards Andy
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
