https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base/?include_text=1
There are several options for the DMARC DNS entry which are called out as optional, with defaults, in the body of the spec. However some of these (aspf, adkim) which are spelled out as optional are not defined so in the XML itself. In 5.2 each are specified as optional, with default='r'. To match this properly, shouldn't the corresponding entry in XML show default="r" and minOccurs="0" elements? Also, the XML does not currently address the new 'fo' entry. Thanks Tomki Camp, Agari Director of Support [email protected] l M: 415.779.2854 l www.agari.com <http://www.agari.com/> Learn who is most vulnerable to cybercrime in the Agari Q2 TrustIndex here <http://info.agari.com/agari-email-trust-index-q2-2013> Sign up for our webinar 8 Steps to DMARC here <http://info.agari.com/agari-weekly-webinar-sign-up>
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
